Home › Legal › Rights in the Netherlands

Rights in the Netherlands

Since 2014 the Netherlands has had a procedure for changing the sex registration and offers protection to transgender people via the Equal Treatment Act, the Criminal Code and the Civil Code. In addition, sex-based rights for women and girls have existed for decades. Between these two legal frameworks tension arises. This page describes both and shows where the Dutch debate so far remains superficial.

Equal treatment

The General Equal Treatment Act (AWGB) prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in employment, education and the provision of goods and services. The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights and Dutch courts have interpreted this prohibition as also applying to gender identity and gender expression. Since an amendment in 2019, 'sex characteristics, gender identity and gender expression' have been explicitly included as grounds in the AWGB.

The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights

The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights handles complaints about discrimination and issues opinions. Those opinions are not legally binding but in practice carry weight. In several rulings the Institute has stressed the importance of inclusion; at the same time it has issued few opinions on the flip side — situations in which sex-based rights of women or girls clash with claims based on gender identity.

Sex registration

Since 2014, changing the sex registration is possible via an expert statement. A legislative proposal to abolish this statement and adopt self-identification as the basis is before parliament, but is contested. See Changing sex registration and Transgender Law Netherlands.

Healthcare rights

Transgender care (hormone therapy, mastectomy, genital surgery) falls under the basic health insurance, provided it is indicated by a recognised care provider. The care model in the Netherlands is strongly affirmative: affirming the self-declared identity has become the norm. Internationally this model is shifting. The United Kingdom has, after the Cass Review (2024), effectively removed puberty blockers for minors from regular care; Sweden, Finland, Norway and Denmark have tightened their care guidelines. See Cass Review and Dutch Protocol.

Tension between gender rights and sex-based rights

Dutch law recognises sex-based provisions historically introduced to protect or advance women and girls. These rights are under pressure where self-defined gender identity becomes the legal basis for access. Concrete points of tension:

• Women's shelters and 'blijf-van-mijn-lijf' homes: set up for women who are victims of male violence. Access for persons with a male biological history is handled variably by institutions. Residents have no legal guarantee of a sex-segregated space.
• Women's sport: categories were established because biological sex differences (strength, speed, lung capacity) are considerable. Federations in among others athletics, swimming and cycling have tightened or restricted the rules for participation of trans women after research showed that hormonal suppression only partly removes earlier acquired advantages.
• Prisons: placement of trans women with a history of violence in a women's prison has led to incidents abroad. In the Netherlands the policy of DJI is not fully transparent; fellow inmates have no say in this.
• Medical care and screening: population screenings (cervical cancer, prostate cancer) are run on the basis of BRP sex and can after a change run incorrectly.
• Statistics and quotas: emancipation policy, pay-gap figures and political participation figures rest on the man/woman distinction as a biological category. Mixing this with legal gender muddies these figures.

In the United Kingdom the highest court ruled in 2025 that 'woman' in the Equality Act refers to biological sex. A comparable clarification is missing in Dutch law.

Non-binary registration

Dutch law recognises as legal categories only M and F. In a number of individual cases the court has allowed the sex registration to be struck through when registration is disproportionately burdensome. A general 'third option' does not exist. Scientifically there are two biological sexes; non-binary identity is a social category, not a biological one.

International comparison

The Netherlands belongs to the countries with relatively far-reaching legal protection in the gender field. At the same time the Netherlands is — unlike the Scandinavian countries or the UK — late in critically reconsidering the care model. See International rights.