Home › Young people › Social media and gender
Social media and gender
The sudden and historically unprecedented rise in trans identifications among young people — particularly among adolescent girls — since around 2012 cannot be seen separately from the simultaneous rise of TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Tumblr and Discord. Anyone who denies this connection denies a pattern that recurs in epidemiological data, clinical reports and parent testimonies across the entire Western world. Social media are not innocent background noise for young people; they are an actively shaping force in how they interpret themselves, their body and their identity.
A new phenomenon, in clusters, virtually out of nowhere
Gender dysphoria was traditionally rare, occurred mainly in boys from early childhood, and developed gradually. From around 2012 onwards the picture changes radically. Adolescent girls with no childhood experience of gender dysphoria — often gifted, perfectionist, with anxiety or depression complaints, sometimes autistic, sometimes victims of bullying or boundary violations — suddenly start identifying as boys, non-binary or trans. Often in clusters within a single friend group. Often after a period of intensive use of TikTok, Tumblr or YouTube.
Lisa Littman and Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD)
The American researcher Lisa Littman described this new phenomenon in 2018 under the name Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria. On the basis of parent reports she identified a pattern of suddenly, cluster-occurring gender dysphoria in teenagers, with intensive social media use and peer contagion as common denominators. Littman (2018) on PubMed.
Littman's research was heavily pressured by activist organisations: her university was forced into a revised version, while the scientific conclusions remained virtually unchanged. Follow-up research (Diaz & Bailey, 2023; Littman replication 2024) confirms the pattern. Read more about ROGD.
How TikTok and YouTube drive identity
Social media platforms are recommendation machines. Watch one video about gender dysphoria and dozens follow. Algorithms maximise engagement, not balance. For an unhappy teenager — depressed, different from their friends, ill at ease with their body — the "trans narrative" offers an appealing explanatory framework: "you are not unhappy with your life, you are unhappy with your sex; affirm your 'true self' and your problems will resolve". That is a simple message; it is also an incorrect message.
Tumblr in 2012-2016 and after that TikTok have been the most visible breeding grounds. Influencers with hundreds of thousands of followers present transition as liberating, as a cool subculture and as a solution to varied forms of pain. Detransition stories are rarely made equally visible by algorithms.
Social contagion: not "the creation of an identity", but a form and direction
Social contagion does not mean that social media "invent" being transgender in a child. It does mean that they shape how a young person interprets unnamed discomfort. An earlier era would presumably have seen those same girls with anorexia, with self-cutting, with depression or as part of a gothic subculture. Adolescent psychological pain always seeks an explanatory model — and that model is supplied by the culture. At this moment that model is increasingly "gender". The pattern is consistent with what sociologists know as "social contagion": an idea, language or self-concept that spreads through clusters of susceptible adolescents.
What parents can know and do
Do not primarily restrict use (that triggers resistance), but be present. Ask what the child is watching. Watch together. Ask about the reasoning. Read the international critical literature yourself: Cass, SBU, Genspect, SEGM. No child benefits from parents who do not know the world in which their child moves — while algorithms are tuned with enormous care to that world.
Make sure the child also encounters other sources — stories of detransitioners, critical doctors, peer-reviewed research and the international evidence reviews (Cass, SBU, COHERE, Ukom). One-sidedness is the norm in this area; counterweight has to be sought deliberately.