Home › Legal › Transgender Law Netherlands

Transgender Law Netherlands

The Transgender Law of 2014 (formal name: 'Act amending the sex entry in the birth certificate') drastically eased the procedure for changing the sex registration. Forced sterilisation and forced genital surgery as conditions disappeared; since then an expert statement is sufficient. A follow-up proposal from 2021 wants to abolish that expert statement too and drop the age limit. That proposal is under political and legal criticism.

What the current law does

The Act amended article 1:28 of the Civil Code. The main elements:

• Changing the sex registration is possible from age 16 via a request to the registrar.
• A statement from a designated expert (psychologist or doctor) is needed saying that the conviction of belonging to the other sex is expected to be lasting.
• For younger children, a court procedure remains the only route.
• A second change via the administrative route is in principle excluded.
• The law recognises only M and F as sex categories in the BRP.

The explanation can be found on the website of the Dutch government.

The self-identification proposal (2021)

In 2021 the government submitted a legislative proposal that:

• scraps the expert statement;
• drops the age limit of 16 (younger minors via the municipality, with consent of the custody-holder);
• moves the procedure to the municipality of residence instead of the municipality of birth;
• includes a brief cooling-off period.

Treatment stalled after the fall of the Rutte IV government and has since been declared controversial or delayed. The proposal stands apart from medical treatment; it regulates only the legal registration.

Criticism of the proposal

Criticism of the proposal comes from diverse quarters — legal, feminist, child-psychiatric — and is often under-illuminated in mainstream coverage. The main objections:

• Scrapping the expert statement removes the last independent check. The current statement is not a medical diagnosis and not 'gatekeeping' in the old sense; it is a low-threshold moment of reflection with a third party. Fully replacing it with self-declaration puts the registration on a par with a free choice.
• Dropping the age limit goes against the state of science on identity development in children and adolescents. The Cass Review (2024) warns explicitly against early legal and social fixation in minors.
• Consequences for sex-based rights are not worked out in the proposal. The result is that interpretation in practice is left to institutions and courts, with the risk that women's shelters, prison policy, sport and medical care must respond ad hoc.
• International experience: in countries that earlier moved to self-identification (Ireland 2015, Denmark 2014, Norway 2016) the procedure is now under evaluation. Scotland withdrew a similar proposal in 2023 after broad social resistance and an intervention from the British government. The Finnish and Swedish situation is rarely brought into the Dutch debate.
• Statistical consequences: without a clear separation between legal gender and biological sex in registrations, research, policy and enforcement become harder in the long run.

What the law does not regulate

The Transgender Law regulates only legal sex registration. Name change, identity documents and medical care fall under other regulations. In particular, medical care for minors — including puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones — is a separate dossier that is in strong international motion.

Political and social debate

The proposal is supported by among others COC Netherlands, Transgender Netwerk and the current care providers within the affirmative model. Objections have been raised by lawyers, parts of the women's movement (including the Voorzij foundation), some child psychiatrists, and political parties that point to the consequences for sex-based provisions. An evaluation of the current 2014 act by the WODC (2017) already noted divergent experiences; a thorough evaluation of the self-identification proposal is missing.

When did the Transgender Law enter into force?

Has the expert statement already been abolished?

Does the law apply to children under 16?

Does the law recognise a third sex category?