Genderinfo.nl

HomeProjects › Wpath.nl

Wpath.nl

A dossier on the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) — the international organisation whose Standards of Care are guiding in gender care worldwide.

Visit the site: wpath.nl

What is Wpath.nl?

WPATH (World Professional Association for Transgender Health) is the international professional association that, since 1979 (originally as Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association), has issued guidelines for the treatment of transgender persons. The most recent version of its Standards of Care — SOC-8 (2022) — is used as a reference by care institutions worldwide, including in the Netherlands. Wpath.nl investigates this organisation: who are the members, how were the guidelines developed, and what criticism exists?

What is on it?

The site addresses, among other things:

  • History of WPATH — from Harry Benjamin (1966) and the first Standards of Care (1979) to SOC-8 (2022);
  • Content of SOC-8 — what the current guideline prescribes for diagnosis, hormones, surgery, youth care and non-binary care;
  • The WPATH Files (2024) — leaked internal discussions revealing that WPATH members themselves acknowledge that informed consent with minors is problematic and that the evidence base is thin;
  • Methodological criticism — the absence of systematic reviews for the SOC-8 recommendations; political influence on the guideline (the previously published age limits were removed under American political pressure);
  • International reorientation — how the British Cass Review, Swedish Karolinska and Finnish Palko no longer use the WPATH guideline as a gold standard;
  • Conflicts of interest — funding, involvement of members in commercial care providers, and the overlap between activism and clinical practice.

For whom?

For care professionals who rely on WPATH guidelines and want to know how they are constructed; for policymakers considering adjustments to Dutch care guidelines; for journalists who use WPATH as a source or as a subject; and for patients and families who want to know what the factual weight is of a 'WPATH-compliant' treatment.

Tone and approach

Direct references to primary documents — the WPATH website itself, the leaked WPATH Files, the Cass Review, the SBU reports and peer-reviewed criticism (Levine, Biggs, Hruz). The site is for clarity in how a guideline comes about and how much weight you can attach to it.

Place within the network

The institutional dossier of the network. A supplement to Dutchprotocol.nl (Dutch model), Genderrisico.nl (medical outcomes) and Genderexperts.nl (who speaks on behalf of whom).