Northern Irish Conversion Practices Law Threatens Therapy

On Friday, September 25, 2026, lawyers, therapists, and human rights organizations gathered in Belfast for a panel discussion with an uncomfortable title: "Banned in Belfast? Free Speech, Conversion Therapy and the New Northern Ireland". The subject was the Conversion Practices Bill, a piece of legislation that would make certain forms of "conversion therapy" a criminal offense in Northern Ireland. The event, organized by Genspect and the Free Speech Union, brought together speakers who each warned that the bill reaches far beyond the coercive practices it claims to target.
What the Conversion Practices Bill Seeks to Criminalize
The bill would criminalize attempts to "change or suppress" a person's sexual orientation or gender identity. On paper, it is a response to real and harmful practices such as gay conversion therapy. The problem, several panelists argued, lies in the vagueness of the definitions: according to critics, even a therapist who thoroughly questions a gender-dysphoric young person instead of immediately affirming them could fall under such a broad definition. Two separate panels examined the issue: one on the broader climate surrounding free speech, led by Dr. Jan Macvarish of the Free Speech Union, and one focused specifically on the wording of the bill, chaired by psychotherapist Dr. Stella O'Malley of Genspect.
"A Shadow Over the Kitchen Table"
Criminal defense lawyer Dennis Kavanagh, co-director of the Gay Men's Network, called the bill "the shadow of criminal law falling across your kitchen table"—an image of the way it affects ordinary conversations between parents, children, and care providers. Clinical psychologist and psychotherapist Jaco van Zyl was more direct: "If I don't go along with my client, there's a target on my back." He described the bill as a hunt for "a phantom problem": in his view, existing criminal law already covers what can genuinely go wrong with coercive practices, without the need for a new, vaguely defined offense. Lawyer Ruth Paterson of the Women's Rights Network went even further, calling the bill "a Trojan horse"—ostensibly aimed at gay conversion therapy, but, in her view, usable in practice against any doctor or therapist who does not immediately affirm a client's stated gender identity.
Why This Matters Beyond Belfast
The Northern Irish debate does not stand alone. Genderinfo has previously reported on the clinical phenomenon researchers refer to as rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD), in which careful assessment—asking follow-up questions, delaying decisions, and examining what else may be involved—helps protect against hasty medicalization. A law that potentially treats therapeutic caution as a criminal offense strikes at precisely the carefulness required by child-protection considerations in the medicalization of gender. The Netherlands has its own law against conversion practices; conversiewet.nl provides a more detailed overview of how different countries seek to balance protection against coercion with the freedom to practice therapy.
Not the First Time a Debate Has Stalled in Belfast
This is not the first time a critical discussion about gender in Belfast has run into trouble: earlier this year, as Genderinfo previously reported, a women's rights debate in the city was canceled as soon as the subject of gender was raised. Speakers on the September 25 panel recognized a pattern: the problem does not seem to be coercion itself, but the fact that discussing it is becoming increasingly difficult.
Context: A Warning from Those Involved, Not Yet a Legal Fact
Two things must be kept separate. The fact that this panel took place, with these speakers and these statements, is a matter of fact, documented by the organizers themselves. Whether the law actually reaches as far as the speakers fear is a legal assessment that has not yet been tested in court—the bill still has to pass through the Northern Ireland Assembly. Genderinfo therefore does not present this concern as an established fact, but as a warning from people who work professionally at the heart of the matter: as lawyers, legal experts, or practitioners. That warning deserves attention as long as the definitions in the bill remain insufficiently precise.
Sources
Genspect, "'The Chilling Bill': Belfast panel warns Conversion Practices Bill is 'chasing a phantom problem'", September 28, 2026—report on the event held in Belfast on September 25, 2026. genspect.org
Edward Jansen
Genderinfo.nl editorial team
Frequently asked questions
Read also
On Coming Out Day, the rainbow flag will fly at the building of the Dutch House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) for the first time. The House decided this on 8 October 2026 by 90 votes to 36, after the Presidium had withdrawn an earlier decision following a procedural objection from the SGP.
At Therapy First’s annual conference in New York in early October 2026, it became clear just how divided even the cautious side of the gender debate is. Therapy First remains committed to a therapy-first approach that leaves room for later medical steps; Genspect categorically rejects medical transition for minors — and the departure of a critical social worker exposes the tension between the two.
New Australian teaching materials and government guidelines replace “boys have penises” with “bodies with penises” and explain reproduction without human figures. A retired sexologist warns that this leaves children without the vocabulary to talk about their own bodies.